http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52699
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52699
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-15 02:14:45 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Apr 15 02:14:39 2012
New Revision: 186461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186461
Log:
2012-04-14 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52699
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-04-14 22:33:27 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Apr 14 22:33:22 2012
New Revision: 186456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186456
Log:
2012-04-14 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52699
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-04-12
13:09:39 UTC ---
And the problem seems pretty clear: we have computations like:
__s0 = result_type(1) << __w0;
with __w0 which can be 32, result_type 32 bits, thus definitely we aren't
handling
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52699
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52699
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |libstdc++
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pins
