[Bug libstdc++/52476] [C++11] Unordered multimap reorders equivalent elements

2012-03-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler 2012-03-04 16:28:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > This means, one could actually remove the [C++11] tag from the bug title. I withdraw this suggestion: In TR1 (N1836) there did no exist the reordering cons

[Bug libstdc++/52476] [C++11] Unordered multimap reorders equivalent elements

2012-03-04 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler 2012-03-04 16:10:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > (we should double check that by avoiding any use of > fancy C++11 features like initializer lists in the testcase) I rewrote the testcase in C++03 form and

[Bug libstdc++/52476] [C++11] Unordered multimap reorders equivalent elements

2012-03-04 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|