[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2015-05-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2015-05-04 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue May 5 01:56:47 2015 New Revision: 222793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222793&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/51617 * include/std/future (async): Change

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2015-04-27 Thread torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||torvald at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2015-01-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.0 |6.0 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2014-07-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.2 |4.10.0

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2014-07-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.1 |4.9.2 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2014-04-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.9.1 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2013-03-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|un

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2013-03-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.8.1 --- Comment #6 from Jakub

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2012-02-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2011-12-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-19 11:13:25 UTC --- That would require a global integer somewhere to count the threads, which would probably have to be kept forever to maintain ABI compatibility. If I had time to implement a temporar

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2011-12-19 Thread dave at boostpro dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #4 from Dave Abrahams 2011-12-19 10:58:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes, this was an intentional choice (as I described in message > c++std-lib-30840) to ensure the system doesn't get killed by a fork bomb, e.g. > writing a p

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2011-12-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/51617] [C++0x] async(f) isn't.

2011-12-19 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51617 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-19 10:43:22 UTC --- Yes, this was an intentional choice (as I described in message c++std-lib-30840) to ensure the system doesn't get killed by a fork bomb, e.g. writing a parallel sort algorithm using