[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomic "operator float"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Severity|major

[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomic "operator float"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 Mark A. Gibbs changed: What|Removed |Added CC||indi.in.the.wired at gmail

[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomic "operator float"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 --- Comment #5 from Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente 2011-06-17 14:41:03 UTC --- You are right, I thought it worked for all fundamental types but reviewing the proposal [1] makes me realise I was wrong. It remains unclear wether user defined enums shoul

[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomic "operator float"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2011-06-17 12:07:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > It looks like C++11 only defines atomic and atomic, so a > link-time error on atomic seems ok, no? Sorry, please ignore the above comment, I should have read

[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomic "operator float"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup

[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomic "operator float"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 --- Comment #2 from Juan Pedro Bolívar Puente 2011-06-17 09:35:29 UTC --- Created attachment 24553 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24553 Test case for the "undefined reference" on atom bug raskolnikov@nexus9:~$ make CXXFLAGS=

[Bug libstdc++/49445] Undefined reference to std::atomic "operator float"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49445 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|