http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-23
13:41:24 UTC ---
any reason the change didn't make it into Boost 1.46.0 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-07 20:15:59 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:15:48 2011
New Revision: 169899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169899
Log:
2011-02-07 Paolo Carlini
PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
18:00:50 UTC ---
Great.
For the record, Bryce, the change to the standard was done by DR 180
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#180
see also
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
17:17:54 UTC ---
Here's a reduced form of the code, which works with GCC 4.5 and earlier, but is
ambiguous with 4.6
#include
struct Key
{
Key() { }
Key(const Key&) { }
template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
17:03:01 UTC ---
btw, your analysis at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/214412 is bogus
There is no C++99, presumably you mean C++98
C++0x mode is absolutely not the default mode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #5 from Bryce Lelbach (wash)
2011-02-07 14:20:09 UTC ---
Sorry! Wasn't aware this was correct.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
09:30:42 UTC ---
Oops, I think I'm confusing this with another related issue - despite what I
said we do seem to have changed the signature, and we currently implement the
C++0x draft spec.
Tables 9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
09:17:08 UTC ---
known issue, the fix changes the ABI and so can't be done yet
N.B. N3225 is the current draft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #1 from Bryce Lelbach (wash)
2011-02-07 01:00:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 23262
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23262
Fix for STL erase() methods on associative containers
14 matches
Mail list logo
