--- Comment #28 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-14 11:41
---
Fixed for 4.5.1.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #27 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-14 11:40 ---
Subject: Bug 43259
Author: paolo
Date: Fri May 14 11:40:05 2010
New Revision: 159389
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159389
Log:
2010-05-14 Silvius Rus
PR libstdc++/43259
*
--- Comment #26 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-11 10:23 ---
Subject: Bug 43259
Author: paolo
Date: Tue May 11 10:23:20 2010
New Revision: 159269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159269
Log:
2010-05-11 Silvius Rus
PR libstdc++/43259
*
--- Comment #25 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-11 10:22 ---
Subject: Bug 43259
Author: paolo
Date: Tue May 11 10:22:18 2010
New Revision: 159268
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159268
Log:
2010-05-11 Silvius Rus
PR libstdc++/43259
*
--- Comment #24 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-09 16:57
---
Silvius, can you prepare a simple patch vs current gcc-4_5-branch? We have time
for mainline, but it is also safe to apply at the same time something simple to
mainline too and then improve it.
--
http://
--- Comment #23 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-07 17:49 ---
Subject: Re: ext/profile/all.cc fails on Solaris
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:53 PM, kgardas at objectsecurity dot com
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #22 from kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2010-05-07 06:53
> ---
> Vi
--- Comment #22 from kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2010-05-07 06:53
---
Viola! Something happens now! Thanks for fixing this.
$ cat test-profile-mode.cc
#include
using namespace std;
int main() {
vector v;
for (int k = 0; k < 1024; ++k) v.insert(v.begin(), k);
}
$ c++ -D_G
--- Comment #21 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-06 20:24
---
At your ease of course.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43259
--- Comment #20 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-06 19:43 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Note that in all those patches, the open curly brackets are in the wrong
> place:
> in GCC, C++ runtime included, must *always* follow a newline. Just stylistic
> issues, of course.
>
Thank you
--- Comment #19 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-06 16:24
---
Note that in all those patches, the open curly brackets are in the wrong place:
in GCC, C++ runtime included, must *always* follow a newline. Just stylistic
issues, of course.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Comment #18 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-06 02:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=20575)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20575&action=view)
Minor fix to previous patch.
Here's a minor fix. It will not affect tests, but just in case you're trying
it for real,
--- Comment #17 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-06 02:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=20574)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20574&action=view)
Wrote custom algos, removed include algorithm, minor fixes.
This should fix several issues. I still see failing tests
--- Comment #16 from kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2010-05-05 10:46
---
(From update of attachment 20560)
Hello,
unfortunately your patch is still not working, but it seems you've solved
originally reported issue. See attached log file for compilers complains with
your patch applied
--- Comment #15 from kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2010-05-05 10:45
---
Created an attachment (id=20560)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20560&action=view)
Output of compiler patched with 43259-0504.patch on SunOS 5.11 snv_134
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Comment #14 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-05 03:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=20559)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20559&action=view)
use ext/concurrence __mutex instead of pthread_mutex_t
Could you please try this patch out on your system? It appears
--- Comment #13 from rus at google dot com 2010-04-28 19:06 ---
Subject: Re: ext/profile/all.cc fails on Solaris
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:36 AM, ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #12 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 18:36 ---
> Any progress on this
--- Comment #12 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-28 18:36 ---
Any progress on this? The bug is open for almost 2 months now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43259
--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-09 10:08
---
*** Bug 43683 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-21 19:15
---
*** Bug 43468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43259
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-21 11:13
---
Excellent, Silvius. Note, I'm not 100% sure about possible deadlines for 4.5.0:
I think the second week of April will be still ok, but I would suggest keeping
an eye to the gcc list and be prepared to move earl
--- Comment #8 from rus at google dot com 2010-03-21 04:52 ---
Good point. I don't think that setenv should be there in the first place
actually. I'll try to fix that as well.
Just FYI, I'm planning to fix all the reported libstdc++ profile issues around
second week of April.
--
h
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-21 01:59
---
Silvius, when you will go through the various roblems on non-linux systems for
this test, also remember that setenv, as used in profiler_trace.h for example,
isn't always available, must be wrapped in #ifdef _G
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-21 01:44
---
*** Bug 43457 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-05 23:17
---
For the sake of completeness, the error on Solaris 8 is the same as on Solaris
9.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43259
--- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-05 18:40 ---
Assigned to Silvius as requested.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ass
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-03-05 10:07
---
Adding Silvius in CC.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 17:45
---
Same on SPARC/Solaris 10:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-03/msg00295.html
Present on SPARC/Solaris 9:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-03/msg00294.html
but the error is different:
/nile
--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 17:44 ---
The problematic line expands to:
static pthread_mutex_t __global_lock(PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER);
which is clearly wrong when PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER is of the form {...}
As you suggest, it should be using gthrea
28 matches
Mail list logo
