--- Comment #11 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-26 18:00
---
Yes, but remember our policy in the future, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42182
--- Comment #10 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2009-11-26 17:44
---
Paolo,
I entered this defect for user reference, since the problem that originates the
thread occurs in many public places such as testsuites (perenial Sec26/P26774)
or class books
(http://www.linux-kheops.com
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-26 12:57
---
The point is that the code is not conforming. In any case, conforming or not,
in the future please do not open Bugzilla for issues already known to the
maintainers, thanks in advance.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2009-11-26 12:18
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> What I meant, exactly, is that if any issue is well known to the concerned
> people, there is no need for a Bugzilla, in particular an invalid one ;)
>
Well I still need to be convinc
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-26 12:15
---
What I meant, exactly, is that if any issue is well known to the concerned
people, there is no need for a Bugzilla, in particular an invalid one ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42182
--- Comment #6 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2009-11-26 12:08
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hey, this is pointless, the issue is well known and Gaby is the reference
> person in this area.
>
no problem, if the issue is known it can be recorded
for the reference, a link to G
--- Comment #5 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2009-11-26 11:40
---
Created an attachment (id=19156)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19156&action=view)
Proposed patch
2009-11-23 Christian Bruel
* include/bits/mask_array.h (mask_array<_Tp>::operato
--- Comment #4 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2009-11-26 11:38
---
Created an attachment (id=19155)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19155&action=view)
controversal testcase
compile with -O0, Segfaults on x86 with
gcc version 4.5.0 20091119 (experimental) [t
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-26 11:35
---
Hey, this is pointless, the issue is well known and Gaby is the reference
person in this area.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2009-11-26 11:35
---
Created an attachment (id=19154)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19154&action=view)
computed assignment test case
compiled with g++ -O0
gnx2439$ valgrind ./a.out==1599== Memcheck, a memory e
--- Comment #1 from christian dot bruel at st dot com 2009-11-26 11:32
---
Created an attachment (id=19153)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19153&action=view)
reduced case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42182
11 matches
Mail list logo
