--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-15 17:41
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I agree we'll wait and see. I think he'll need comparison operators.
> You could compare the contents of param_type because all the bits are
> available as calls. But you'll st
--- Comment #11 from 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2009-08-15 17:29 ---
Subject: Re: Compile of program using std random fails.
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-15
> 16:27 ---
> You are welcome. By the w
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-15 16:27
---
You are welcome. By the way, Walter Brown told me in private email that is
working on the "de-conceptified" specifications, let's see what happens of
those comparison operators...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Comment #9 from 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2009-08-15 16:04 ---
Subject: Re: Compile of program using std random fails.
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-14 23:34
> ---
> Fixed.
>
>
>
Paolo,
Tha
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-14 23:43
---
In future work, remember to avoid comparing for strict equality floating point
numbers in the testsuite, isn't a well defined operation, as we all know.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41061
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-14 23:34
---
Fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 23:33 ---
Subject: Bug 41061
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Aug 14 23:33:27 2009
New Revision: 150783
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150783
Log:
2009-08-14 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
--- Comment #5 from 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2009-08-14 22:10 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Can you extract the tests that were failing and add them to the testsuite?
>
I will do that.
Also, I just found out something interesting as I was searching for a nice way
to test this. I fa
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |paolo dot carlini at oracle
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-14 10:33 ---
Can you extract the tests that were failing and add them to the testsuite?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41061
--- Comment #3 from 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2009-08-13 20:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=18359)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18359&action=view)
This is a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41061
--- Comment #2 from 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2009-08-13 20:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=18358)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18358&action=view)
This is te original error message stream.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41061
--- Comment #1 from 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2009-08-13 20:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=18357)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18357&action=view)
Here is my busybox which is mainly an amalgamation of the tests I wrote when I
built the random patch.
--
http:/
13 matches
Mail list logo
