--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-18 15:05
---
Fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-18 15:03 ---
Subject: Bug 37147
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Aug 18 15:02:10 2008
New Revision: 139200
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139200
Log:
2008-08-18 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstd
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-18 14:49 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> If you want, you can try to compile ** as a C++ program, this
> is important ** the below. If my analysis is correct, should not compile,
> meaning we can't really assume a C99-conforming for y
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-18 14:11
---
Thanks Hans-Peter, probably I don't need further information. I'm already
testing the fix. If you want, you can try to compile ** as a C++ program, this
is important ** the below. If my analysis is correct, sho
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-18 14:05 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Something you should also immediately check is whether those tests actually
> were run before the changes and not skipped,
You're right, all of
20_util/ratio/comparisons/comp2.cc
20_util/ratio/
