[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-17 20:17 --- Thanks a lot! sparc-sun-solaris2.8 and hppa*-hp-hpux11.11 build again. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35221

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-17 15:49 --- Fixed. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-17 15:47 --- Subject: Bug 35221 Author: paolo Date: Sun Feb 17 15:46:30 2008 New Revision: 132380 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132380 Log: 2008-02-17 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libstd

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-17 14:43 --- Ok, I'm taking care of that. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|u

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-17 14:14 --- Yes - please consider reverting the change that caused this PR and work on this on the trunk after we have branched. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35221

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-17 11:33 --- Thanks Eric. I'm not sure that rework is appropriate for 4.3.0, though... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35221

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-17 11:05 --- > The problem is just that isn't available everywhere (I don't think > the > configure checks can be weakened). Probably we should just keep the old "by > hand" typedefs. The canonical solution is config/stdint

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-17 10:59 --- The problem is just that isn't available everywhere (I don't think the configure checks can be weakened). Probably we should just keep the old "by hand" typedefs. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-17 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-17 09:51 --- *** Bug 35230 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35221

[Bug libstdc++/35221] [4.3 Regression] libstdc++ broken

2008-02-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-16 23:18 --- Benjamin, why this late changes shortly before the release? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -