--- Comment #3 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-23 11:32 ---
Ok, let's close it...
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIR
--- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-06-11 15:25 ---
Hi Benjamin. If you ask me, this issue is INVALID: it is *not* supported
building the library normally and then passing -D_GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING
on the command line, and never was! Simply because basic_string is expo
--- Comment #1 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-11 14:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=13679)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13679&action=view)
add checks for empty
Possible patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32284
