--- Comment #22 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-12 11:37 ---
This is closed as gcjx is dead.
--
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-10-24 06:18
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, any news about this issue?
gcjx has been declared dead. I never got to have the issue fixed.
So, it is up to
--- Comment #20 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-17 09:28 ---
Gaby, any news about this issue?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25608
--- Comment #19 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2006-03-17 23:37
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
"bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| is this still an active issue, or was it indicative of some temporary or
| transient thing in the gcc sources?
"bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| is this still an active issue, or was it indicative of some temporary or
| transient thing in the gcc sources?
Now, I get a "segmentation fault" -- instead of dead lock.
gcjx is compiled with mainline GCC/g++.
I was trying to compile cla
--- Comment #18 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-17 18:33 ---
is this still an active issue, or was it indicative of some temporary or
transient thing in the gcc sources?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25608
--- Comment #17 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-26 16:45 ---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
"bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| ps tom this kind of organization for compiling looks dreamy:
Yup! I dream of when other GCC parts would be similarly or
--- Comment #16 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-26 16:44 ---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
"bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, here's the one thing that I can think of that changed between 3.4.x and
| mainline/4.1 in this code path:
Thank you
--- Comment #15 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 16:35 ---
ps tom this kind of organization for compiling looks dreamy:
#20 0x400afc18 in compiler::do_analyze_unit (this=0x8055248, unit=0x8089dc0)
at exception.hh:63
#21 0x400afebf in compiler::semantic_analysis (this=0x80
--- Comment #14 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 16:32 ---
Gaby, here's the one thing that I can think of that changed between 3.4.x and
mainline/4.1 in this code path:
2005-10-10 Ian Lance Taylor
PR libstdc++/13583
* include/bits/locale_classes.h (locale
--- Comment #13 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-19 18:23 ---
FWIW I suspect there is undefined code in gcjx.
For instance I think the constant evaluation code assumes
-fwrapv behavior. There could well be other undefined code,
but I don't know of any.
That said, it seems unl
--- Comment #12 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-31 05:56
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hmm, can you try the following C++ program and see if it works for you:
It works for me at -O0, -O1, -O2, -O
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 05:46
---
Hmm, can you try the following C++ program and see if it works for you:
#include
int main(void)
{
for(int j=0;j<1000;j++){
std::ostringstream a;
char *a1 = "aa";
for(int i =0;ihttp
--- Comment #10 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-31 05:07
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This seems very related to PR 12658.
it was fixed in all branches.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #9 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-31 04:44
---
Subject: Re: g++ miscompiles gcjx
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #7)
| > Before reclassifying, it would useful to provide data. If you cannot,
| > please
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 04:33 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Before reclassifying, it would useful to provide data. If you cannot,
> please move on something else. You're not being helpful here.
Since this is reproducible from 4.0 upwards and it i
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-31 04:17 ---
This sounds more like a libstdc++ issue rather than a front-end or optimizer
issue.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
17 matches
Mail list logo
