--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-10-08 01:32 ---
No open issues.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #8 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 23:12 ---
We'd certainly not forget about this on the branch.
However, I decided to just go ahead and do this anyway, because it is a change
in behavior but mostly because it seems to be confusing people/distros WRT what
alloc
--- Comment #7 from matz at suse dot de 2005-11-07 19:59 ---
Of course not. But unaware people trying trunk currently on distros which
provided 3.4 or 4.0 will get non-obvious problems, and I'm not sure if that's
a good idea (ignoring this problem 4.0 and trunk are nearly compatible, an
--- Comment #6 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-04 17:41 ---
In general, we make no claims as to ABI compliance wrt development/trunk
versions.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21072
--- Comment #5 from matz at suse dot de 2005-11-04 14:45 ---
While 4.0 had this fixed, trunk still uses the 'mt' allocator by default
on linux, and hence is incompatible with 3.4 and 4.0 by default. Is that
really intended, or shouldn't also trunk default back to the 'new' allocator?
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-04-17 18:27
---
Ick! :(
Actually, I clearly remember a message from Mark warning that something could go
wrong when using different allocators in different sources, but then forgot
about the issue when we switched. I really hope
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 17:59
---
Additional fixes include adding _M_reclaim_block checks. However, this seems to
be patching the symptom, not the disease.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21072
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 17:57
---
Created an attachment (id=8667)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8667&action=view)
revert base allocator change
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21072
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 17:56
---
Created an attachment (id=8666)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8666&action=view)
bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21072
