--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 18:33
---
In mainline, gcc-4.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RES
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-13 21:43
---
Great. I'll put this in then.
Thanks,
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979
--- Additional Comments From dhruvbird at yahoo dot com 2005-04-13 17:02
---
Subject: Re: __gnu_cxx::bitmap_allocator export pruning
--- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu
> dot org 2005-04-13 16:32 ---
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-13 16:32
---
I posit that this usage of static local variables, as written, is thread safe
with gcc-4.0.x compilers. (Since resolution of c++/13684).
! _Mutex*
! _M_get_mutex()
! {
! static _Mutex _S_mute
--- Additional Comments From dhruvbird at yahoo dot com 2005-04-13 12:11
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=8615)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8615&action=view)
> free_list:: static removal
>
Hi,
What has been done seems ok, but there is j
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhruvbird at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-12 21:46
---
Created an attachment (id=8615)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8615&action=view)
free_list:: static removal
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979
