[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2007-02-12 Thread mike at tedder dot com
--- Comment #11 from mike at tedder dot com 2007-02-12 10:45 --- Whatever this bug was in 3.4.3, does not occur or has been fixed in gcc-3.4.6 or gcc-4.1.1. Both of these compile bootstrap without any problems. For the record (and just to make sure it wasn't anything specific with my s

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2005-08-06 Thread mike at tedder dot com
--- Additional Comments From mike at tedder dot com 2005-08-06 18:16 --- I wouldn't have opened this bug if the standard configure && make bootstrap && make install had worked in the first place. It might have helped more if you had asked me more questions about my system and/or confi

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2005-08-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-06 15:19 --- This works for everyone else, I have no idea what your problem is here. Maybe you are over writting the libtool in GCC which is just wrong, you should be able to just mkdir objdir;cd objdir;$(srcdir)/conf

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2005-01-06 Thread mike at tedder dot com
--- Additional Comments From mike at tedder dot com 2005-01-06 13:37 --- Sorry for the late reply. Yes, I've noticed that gcc-3.4.0 and 3.4.1 has been successfully built for powerpc, which is why I figured I might have done something wrong. I upgraded to binutils-2.14 and glibc-2.3.3

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2005-01-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 06:18 --- Can you try a newer binutils than 2.13.90.0.10, since that is known to have bugs? And since this is known to work for other people? -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2005-01-05 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-06 05:32 --- Have you noticed the successful build reports? They are here: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/buildstat.html So, this is possible. You just need to figure out how your setup differs from the successful reports.

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2004-12-14 Thread mike at tedder dot com
--- Additional Comments From mike at tedder dot com 2004-12-14 16:23 --- Created an attachment (id=7740) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7740&action=view) requested config.log from failed compile taken from "/usr/src/gcc-3.4.3-objdir/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2004-12-14 Thread mike at tedder dot com
--- Additional Comments From mike at tedder dot com 2004-12-14 16:31 --- I attached the config.log file you requested. I wasn't sure if you were interested in the one also located in nof/, so I attached them both. If it matters at all, I'm using binutils-2.13.90.0.10 (built with gcc-3

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2004-12-14 Thread mike at tedder dot com
--- Additional Comments From mike at tedder dot com 2004-12-14 16:24 --- Created an attachment (id=7741) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7741&action=view) requested config.log from failed compile (in nof) taken from "/usr/src/gcc-3.4.3-objdir/powerpc-unknown-linux-gn

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2004-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-12 21:35 --- Can you attach the config.log that is in libstdc++ directory? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18889

[Bug libstdc++/18889] Unable to build libstdc++-v3

2004-12-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-08 16:20 --- libtool looks like it is messing up. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18889