--- Additional Comments From work at paul dot dubuc dot org 2004-11-29
14:41 ---
OK. I wondered if the change was really as easy as it looked.
Thanks for looking into this, Paolo.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18633
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-11-26 10:58
---
Actually, just moving down the resize is not ok, since __n and __first would
need
to be recomputed too, with a non-trivial overhead in case of insert. Also, the
memory doubling happens only when one of the thresho
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-11-23 19:49
---
Thanks.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pcarlini at suse dot
