https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 19 21:43:55 2016
New Revision: 232586
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232586&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add C++-conforming wrappers for stdlib.h and math.h
PR libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gnu at bluedreamer dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|ia64-hp-hpux11.23,*-*-darwi |ia64-hp-hpux11.23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at redhat dot com
--- Comment #11 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14608
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
--- Comment #9 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 20:49 ---
Looks to me like the flipside of libstdc++/7439. More broadly speaking, C99
macros vs. C++98/0x. The current status on this issue is:
For 4.1/4.2/4.3/trunk, C99 macros should be visible with
1) -std=gnu99/c99 in "C
