--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-09-07 10:55
---
Fixed for 4.1.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-26
15:47 ---
Subject: Bug 13943
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-26 15:46:48
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog acinclude.m4 configure
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 21:20
---
Actually, I have a much better idea, that I'm testing right now: no need for
complex template-based tricks (in this case, at variance with the case of
classification macros, we *know* the type of the arguments!): l
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-05-22 10:32 ---
Subject: Re: call of overloaded `llabs(int)' is ambiguous
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gaby, can you have a look?
Yup. Just woke up and many people are awaiting in the TO
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 09:32
---
Same for strt* and the other functions. Also we should remember to add to the
acinclude check for c99_stdlib the functions strtoll and strtoull, currently
missing.
(PS. In the meanwhile, done a minimal check that
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-22 09:15
---
Gaby, can you have a look? It seems to me that we should use the same approach
used in std_cmath.h for fpclassify & co. In particular, when _GLIBCXX_USE_C99
is defined - that explicitly checks for llabs and lldiv -
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21
23:35 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed, most likely what needs to happen is to add a check to libstdc++'s
> configure for llabs.
This again should happen.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21
23:34 ---
Reopening for now.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|RE
--- Additional Comments From g_bugz at zewt dot org 2005-05-21 23:26
---
(Awesome. I spend ten minutes typing out a response, the tracker goes "you
can't do that!", and I lose it all. Only Debian gets their tracker right ...)
(Very old response, since the fact that this was closed wa
