https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a341d96add049e1ebc94e7350ff59e82b03043d2
commit r15-9658-ga341d96add049e1ebc94e7350ff59e82b03043d2
Author: Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:31cbac3037b7811bd0df63f4a09aa981b250c4bf
commit r16-539-g31cbac3037b7811bd0df63f4a09aa981b250c4bf
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Thanks. I don't think we need to check the string, if an error occurs then we
get an exception anyway:
Python Exception : Undefined command: "skap". Try "help".
(triggered by replacing one of the gdb.e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #13 from Simon Marchi ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> I think it would be better to silence it. Do you know how to do that?
Since this is execute using gdb.execute in Python, you can probably pass
to_string=True
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> I think it would be better to silence it. Do you know how to do that?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15814#c3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think it would be better to silence it. Do you know how to do that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
Simon Marchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.marchi at polymtl dot ca
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> std::get for pair is from C++11, but yes it's a good candidate.
I was talking about std::get for std::complex :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
std::get for pair is from C++11, but yes it's a good candidate.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
> Good enough? Any other suggestions for functions to skip?
>
> std::get for tuples?
Most likely std::get for pair and complex (though that is C++26 and I am n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Good enough? Any other suggestions for functions to skip?
std::get for tuples?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b4ff53381250c56ecfc69204e662d8832d113e5
commit r15-6697-g6b4ff53381250c56ecfc69204e662d8832d113e5
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Not all of those containers actually have a back() or data() member function,
but it doesn't matter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems like a good start:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/python/hook.in
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/python/hook.in
@@ -55,6 +55,11 @@ if gdb.current_objfile () is not None:
if not dir_ in sys.path:
sys.path.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I would like it if the libstdc++ code could use an attribute to opt-in to the
-ffold-simple-inlines logic used for std::move etc.
As noted in PR 96780, at some point I tried using __attribute__((artificia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118260
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
17 matches
Mail list logo
