[Bug libstdc++/117899] C++17 parallel execution policies with OpenMP backend

2024-12-17 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117899 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug libstdc++/117899] C++17 parallel execution policies with OpenMP backend

2024-12-12 Thread krispyro at wanadoo dot fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117899 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Piault --- We have a RFE opened for this issue and will try to see with Intel contacts if they can update their plans. If you know another way to fund this work, feel free to share.

[Bug libstdc++/117899] C++17 parallel execution policies with OpenMP backend

2024-12-12 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117899 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Instead of looking for volunteers you might need to consider funding somebody to do the work. A new PSTL backend is a large and complex piece of work. A SPIR-V backend would be even larger.

[Bug libstdc++/117899] C++17 parallel execution policies with OpenMP backend

2024-12-12 Thread krispyro at wanadoo dot fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117899 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Piault --- According to Intel support team they don't have any plans currently regarding an OpenMP backend on their side. Looking for volunteers, AdaptiveCpp author is "very open to collaborating with the GCC proj

[Bug libstdc++/117899] C++17 parallel execution policies with OpenMP backend

2024-12-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117899 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-12-03 Ever confirmed|0