[Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator

2006-03-27 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #15 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-03-27 17:28 --- *** Bug 26887 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator

2005-10-08 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #14 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-08 14:57 --- *** Bug 24274 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator

2005-10-05 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #13 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-05 15:50 --- Fixed for 4.1. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator

2005-10-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-05 15:49 --- Subject: Bug 11729 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-05 15:49:39 Modified files: libstdc++-v3 : ChangeLog libstdc++-v3/include/bits

[Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator

2005-10-04 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-10-04 15:44 --- The DR is now [Ready] and we can implement its straightforward resolution. -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libstdc++/11729] [DR280] no operator!= for const_reverse_iterator

2005-01-21 Thread pcarlini at suse dot de
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-01-21 11:34 --- *** Bug 19562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added