https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108823
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Or decltype(ranges::size(r1) + ranges::size(r2)) ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108823
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Is std::min(ranges::size(__r1), ranges::size(__r2)) safe? Probably not,
since we could have iota(0LL, LLONG_MAX) on a 32-bit host where size_t is
32-bit. So I suppose it should be uintmax_t instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108823
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
So maybe something like:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ranges_algo.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/ranges_algo.h
@@ -758,11 +758,21 @@ namespace ranges
_Out __result, _Fp __binary_op,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108823
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|