https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102221
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102221
--- Comment #6 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
Hi,
(Sorry for chiming in after all this time); given this might not entirely be
libstdc++ related (cf. the latest testcase), would it be possible for someone
on the optimizer to gave their opinion?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102221
--- Comment #5 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
Here's a further testcase that doesn't even use unique_ptr:
#include
#include
using ptr = int *;
using rawptr = int *;
#ifndef RESTRICT
#define RESTRICT
#endif
void swap(ptr & RESTRICT a, ptr & RE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102221
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> This comes from the construction of a local unique_ptr variable in:
>
> template
> _GLIBCXX20_CONSTEXPR
> void
> __unguarded_linear_insert(_Ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102221
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #2)
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the analysis!
>
> That basically allows me to reduce the testcase to something as simple as a
> swap:
Yes. The actual swaps done by s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102221
--- Comment #2 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
Hi,
Thanks for the analysis!
That basically allows me to reduce the testcase to something as simple as a
swap:
#include
#include
#if defined(SMART)
using ptr = std::unique_ptr;
#else
using ptr = i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102221
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
