https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #23 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:964741883aedae54621992e25aac928a96b9c096
commit r10-11372-g964741883aedae54621992e25aac928a96b9c096
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 11.4 as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d98f84ca37a154a24f3f2b2950bfb450cbe6316
commit r11-10719-g9d98f84ca37a154a24f3f2b2950bfb450cbe6316
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed for 12.3 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7d685cb42c1568f6ac017ea2503b366ec474ce0e
commit r12-9282-g7d685cb42c1568f6ac017ea2503b366ec474ce0e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #18 from niXman ---
tested on i686 and x86_64 mingw-w64 - works as expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #17 from niXman ---
(In reply to niXman from comment #15)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> > Fixed now on the trunk. I'd wait a little bit with backports, though I
> > think the gmp-param.h change doesn't need backpor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #16 from niXman ---
trying to build x86_64-mingw-w64 and check...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #15 from niXman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> Fixed now on the trunk. I'd wait a little bit with backports, though I
> think the gmp-param.h change doesn't need backporting.
unfortunately, the bug is still prese
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #14 from niXman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> Fixed now on the trunk. I'd wait a little bit with backports, though I
> think the gmp-param.h change doesn't need backporting.
Thank you Jakub!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed now on the trunk. I'd wait a little bit with backports, though I think
the gmp-param.h change doesn't need backporting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df63f4162c78ef799d4ea9dec3443d5e9c51e5aa
commit r13-6427-gdf63f4162c78ef799d4ea9dec3443d5e9c51e5aa
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #11 from niXman ---
Created attachment 54301
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54301&action=edit
patch
(In reply to niXman from comment #9)
> although I think these two bugs have the same cause...
right, it was th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #10 from niXman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> As Joseph wrote, there were lots of strtod_l.c fixes since 2011 and most of
> them weren't incorporated into libquadmath (unlike most of the math/
> functions which wer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #9 from niXman ---
although I think these two bugs have the same cause...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #7 from niXman ---
(In reply to niXman from comment #5)
> because it's MinGW specific:
I will paraphrase:
this report is for MinGW.
but another one - 87204, looks like NOT. but im unsure... will work on it too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #6 from niXman ---
(In reply to niXman from comment #3)
> BTW, I have fixed it for x86_64-mingw32. trying to rebuild for i686-mingw32
> for check.
yeah, it's fixed.
works on x86_64 and i686 MinGW.
will check it on Linux host too for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #5 from niXman ---
because it's MinGW specific:
> Demo strtoflt128 error with some subnormals on Windows
but another one - 87204, looks like NOT. but im unsure... will work on it too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I can reproduce it on x86_64-linux with -m32 too:
f1: 0x0.00014707e947d757fbf6f7p-16382
f2: 0x0.00014707e946d257f2f674b9p-16382
but can't with -m64 nor when using glibc 2.35 strtof128 (in that case it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #3 from niXman ---
BTW, I have fixed it for x86_64-mingw32. trying to rebuild for i686-mingw32 for
check.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #2 from niXman ---
guys, how can I add that
report(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87204) as duplicate of this
report?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94756
--- Comment #1 from niXman ---
unfortunately, this bug is still present on the master branch...
trying to deal with it..
24 matches
Mail list logo