[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2009-03-14 Thread ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-14 17:05 --- Fixed for 4.4.0 -- ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSI

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2009-03-14 Thread ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org |org

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2009-03-12 Thread ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-12 22:28 --- Subject: Bug 27466 Author: ayers Date: Thu Mar 12 22:28:15 2009 New Revision: 144826 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144826 Log: libobjc/ 2009-03-12 Richard Frith-Macdonald David

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2009-02-25 Thread ayers at fsfe dot org
--- Comment #7 from ayers at fsfe dot org 2009-02-26 05:24 --- Created an attachment (id=17365) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17365&action=view) Alternative patch using a callback hook This patch was posted as an RFA: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg01

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2009-02-25 Thread ayers at fsfe dot org
--- Comment #6 from ayers at fsfe dot org 2009-02-26 05:16 --- Created an attachment (id=17364) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17364&action=view) Updated patch (using and accessor function) inlcuding a test case For the record: This is an update of the existing pat

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2009-01-01 Thread rfm at gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rfm at gnu dot org 2009-01-01 15:08 --- I just checked up on this again ... The problem was initially reported two and a half years ago. I supplied a (very very simple) patch to fix it a month ago. Could someone please apply the patch so it gets into the next release

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2008-12-17 Thread rfm at gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rfm at gnu dot org 2008-12-17 09:36 --- Is anyone monitoring/progressing this bug? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27466

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2008-12-08 Thread rfm at gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rfm at gnu dot org 2008-12-08 08:29 --- Any news on when this can be done? The path is tiny/trivial, so even though it might be judged low priority I'd have hoped it could be fitted in quickly. -- rfm at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2008-11-28 Thread rfm at gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rfm at gnu dot org 2008-11-28 15:56 --- Created an attachment (id=16787) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16787&action=view) An implementation of objc_set_unexpected function We really need this function to use native objective-c in GNUstep. The ti

[Bug libobjc/27466] RFE: Support for libobjc equivalent of std::set_unexpected

2006-05-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-07 06:24 --- It will most likely be called objc_set_unexpected like all other libobjc functions and then GNUStep will implement NSSetUncaughtExceptionHandler. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Re