[Bug libmudflap/31681] [4.3 regression]: Many libmudflap faulures

2007-06-12 Thread rob1weld at aol dot com
--- Comment #5 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-06-12 11:21 --- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Fixed. Nope. Results for 4.3.0 20070611 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-06/msg00573.html A portion of this bug report is duplicated at: ht

[Bug libmudflap/31681] [4.3 regression]: Many libmudflap faulures

2007-05-18 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-05-18 22:41 --- Fixed. -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |

[Bug libmudflap/31681] [4.3 regression]: Many libmudflap faulures

2007-05-18 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-18 22:35 --- Subject: Bug 31681 Author: hjl Date: Fri May 18 21:35:12 2007 New Revision: 124835 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124835 Log: 2007-05-18 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR target/31989

[Bug libmudflap/31681] [4.3 regression]: Many libmudflap faulures

2007-04-28 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-28 19:31 --- I have verified that this patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg01333.html causes this regression on Linux/x86-64. Richard, can you take a look? Thanks. -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|

[Bug libmudflap/31681] [4.3 regression]: Many libmudflap faulures

2007-04-28 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-28 17:21 --- It works with revision 123966: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg00980.html fails with revision 124014: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-04/msg01094.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug libmudflap/31681] [4.3 regression]: Many libmudflap faulures

2007-04-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31681