https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|10.1.0 |10.2.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
Chinoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
--- Comment #4 from Chinoune ---
after some tests, It looks like it fails with only with small sizes.
The program doesn't crash when increasing matrices size. and It takes a shorter
time to execute!.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
--- Comment #3 from Chinoune ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #1)
> * You compilation uses "-O0" – I do not know whether that's intended.
I didn't set any optimization flag, maybe the compiler default to "-O0".
>
> * I did not see a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
--- Comment #2 from Chinoune ---
Created attachment 48546
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48546&action=edit
debug ouput
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95150
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
* You compilation uses "-O0" – I do not know whether that's intended.
* I did not see any timeout message although it did take a while to run
with offloading. (See timing results below.)
I wonder what ca
10 matches
Mail list logo
