https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
ping^2: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00754.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
> For now, marking missed-optimization/enhancement. There might also be
> correctness failures due to the lack of explicit handling, I'm not sure.
Which is why I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For now, marking missed-optimization/enhancement. There might also be
correctness failures due to the lack of explicit handling, I'm not sure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, patch
---
