http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58756
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 16 10:34:28 2013
New Revision: 206011
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgomp/58756
* omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses) : For
red
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58756
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sounds like omp-low.c bug, this is reproduceable even on i?86/x86_64 with
safelen(1) clause on the #pragma omp simd in foo function. Will look at it
tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58756
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Adding omp_get_thrad_num to the printf:
$ ./a.out
3 496
3 496
2 496
2 496
2 496
2 496
2 496
2 496
2 496
2 496
3 496
3 496
3 496
3 496
3 496
3 496
1 496
1 496
1 496
1 496
1 496
1 496
0 496
0 496
0 496
0 496
0 49
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58756
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Some unscientific printf debugging yields following runtime difference:
foo (int a, int b)
{
int j, c = 0;
#pragma omp parallel for reduction(+: c)
for (j = 0; j < a; j += b)
{
int l;
#pra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58756
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11,
|
