[Bug libgcj/30076] [ecj] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-07 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 01:26 --- Fix checked in. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NE

[Bug libgcj/30076] [ecj] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-07 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 01:19 --- Subject: Bug 30076 Author: tromey Date: Fri Dec 8 01:19:17 2006 New Revision: 119644 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=119644 Log: PR libgcj/30076: * defineclass.cc (read_fields)

[Bug libgcj/30076] [ecj] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-07 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 01:15 --- Oh, I see. It is just that we need: Arrays.sort(methods, myCollator); -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30076

[Bug libgcj/30076] [ecj] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-07 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 01:13 --- I needed this to see correct output. There's still some oddity where main sorts before barf in the output, I haven't looked at that. --- pp.java.~1~ 2006-12-05 11:49:25.0 -0700 +++ pp.java 2006-12-07 17:5

[Bug libgcj/30076] [ecj] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-07 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-08 00:15 --- Also we appear to incorrect create the annotation data structure for one of the methods. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libgcj/30076] [ecj] Annotations don't work with interpreted code

2006-12-05 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-05 20:12 --- Created an attachment (id=12750) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12750&action=view) . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30076