[Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait

2005-11-29 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-29 17:13 --- Fix checked in everywhere. -- tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait

2005-11-25 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 17:20 --- Subject: Bug 25016 Author: aph Date: Fri Nov 25 17:20:09 2005 New Revision: 107511 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107511 Log: 2005-11-25 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libgcj/2501

[Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait

2005-11-25 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 16:31 --- Subject: Bug 25016 Author: aph Date: Fri Nov 25 16:31:09 2005 New Revision: 107510 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107510 Log: 2005-11-25 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libgcj/2501

[Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait

2005-11-25 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-25 16:18 --- Subject: Bug 25016 Author: aph Date: Fri Nov 25 16:18:17 2005 New Revision: 107509 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107509 Log: 2005-11-25 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR libgcj/2501

[Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait

2005-11-24 Thread overholt at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 from overholt at redhat dot com 2005-11-24 15:21 --- This test case does not work for me when I have not applied the patch. After application and building, it does appear to run "forever" :) Also, the Eclipse issue that spurred this on (referenced in comment #1) is fixed

[Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait

2005-11-24 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait

2005-11-24 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 11:48 --- Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q4/msg00222.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25016

[Bug libgcj/25016] Integer overflow in _Jv_CondWait

2005-11-24 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-24 11:48 --- Consider this program: public class TimedWait { public static void main (String[] argv) throws InterruptedException { Object o = new Object(); synchronized (o) { o.wait(Long.MAX_VALUE);