[Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-29 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29 17:42 --- I checked this in to cvs trunk. It should go in 4.0 as well once the branch reopens. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211

[Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29 17:36 --- Subject: Bug 22211 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-29 17:36:16 Modified files: libjava: ChangeLog libjava/java/lang:

[Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-29 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29 17:22 --- Actually, I wrote a very simple test case and I'm simply going to check in my fix. The test just makes a Thread and calls interrupt on it before starting it. With gij this currently aborts. -- http://gc

[Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-29 Thread greenrd at greenrd dot org
--- Additional Comments From greenrd at greenrd dot org 2005-06-29 17:20 --- Sure. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211

[Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-29 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29 17:06 --- I have a patch for this. Could you try it with RSSOwl if I send it to you? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-29 Thread mlists at juma dot me dot uk
-- What|Removed |Added CC||mlists at juma dot me dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211

[Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-28 Thread greenrd at greenrd dot org
--- Additional Comments From greenrd at greenrd dot org 2005-06-28 15:12 --- Ignore previous comment. As a (probably overzealous) legal precaution, I will not be submitting a patch. (For the record, I do not believe any of my previous contributions are problematic in any way.) Consider

[Bug libgcj/22211] Thread.interrupt sometimes causes abort if thread is already dead

2005-06-28 Thread greenrd at greenrd dot org
--- Additional Comments From greenrd at greenrd dot org 2005-06-28 09:18 --- Working on a patch, but bugzilla won't let me own this bug because it hasn't been confirmed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22211