[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20750

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-05 Thread fitzsim at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-06 03:57 --- Fixed on HEAD and gcc-4_0-branch. Closing. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-06 03:44 --- Subject: Bug 20750 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-06 03:43:58 Modified files: libjava: Change

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-05 23:46 --- Subject: Bug 20750 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 23:46:09 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/doc: i

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-04 Thread fitzsim at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 21:39 --- Yes, eventually we'll install the same compatibiliy symlink forest we currently install in java-gcj-compat. For now though I only expect distributions packaging java-gcj-compat to use this option. For example,

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-04 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 21:27 --- Yeah, in the case where java-gcj-compat is merged into libgcj (ie libgcj is set up to look like a JVM) then this option makes sense. libgcj would install its .jars and whatever other JVMish files applications e

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-04 Thread fitzsim at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 20:48 --- I should also mention; currently java-gcj-compat is separate from libgcj because it depends on ecj. Once gcjx lands we can use it as our bytecode compiler, and distributions will likely want to merge java-gcj-co

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-04 Thread fitzsim at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 20:44 --- The advantage is that we can then eliminate the java wrapper script completely and symlink the java command directly to gij. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20750

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-04 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 20:03 --- Whats the advantage to setting these at configure time? Couldn't java-gcj-compat just set them when it invokes gij? It seems a little awkward to hardcode paths like "java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0" into libgcj when thi

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04 19:15 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug libgcj/20750] libgcj needs a --with-java-home configure option

2005-04-04 Thread fitzsim at redhat dot com
-- What|Removed |Added Component|java|libgcj http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20750