--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20750
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-06 03:57
---
Fixed on HEAD and gcc-4_0-branch. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-06
03:44 ---
Subject: Bug 20750
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-06 03:43:58
Modified files:
libjava: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-05
23:46 ---
Subject: Bug 20750
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-05 23:46:09
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/doc: i
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 21:39
---
Yes, eventually we'll install the same compatibiliy symlink forest we currently
install in java-gcj-compat. For now though I only expect distributions
packaging java-gcj-compat to use this option. For example,
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 21:27
---
Yeah, in the case where java-gcj-compat is merged into libgcj (ie libgcj is set
up to look like a JVM) then this option makes sense.
libgcj would install its .jars and whatever other JVMish files applications
e
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 20:48
---
I should also mention; currently java-gcj-compat is separate from libgcj because
it depends on ecj. Once gcjx lands we can use it as our bytecode compiler, and
distributions will likely want to merge java-gcj-co
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 20:44
---
The advantage is that we can then eliminate the java wrapper script completely
and symlink the java command directly to gij.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20750
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-04-04 20:03
---
Whats the advantage to setting these at configure time? Couldn't java-gcj-compat
just set them when it invokes gij?
It seems a little awkward to hardcode paths like "java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0" into
libgcj when thi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-04
19:15 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|java|libgcj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20750
11 matches
Mail list logo