--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604
--- Comment #9 from gbenson at redhat dot com 2006-07-28 10:59 ---
Fixed.
--
gbenson at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from gary at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 10:54 ---
Subject: Bug 13604
Author: gary
Date: Fri Jul 28 10:54:11 2006
New Revision: 115793
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115793
Log:
2006-07-28 Gary Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Casey Mars
--
gbenson at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |gbenson at redhat dot com
|dot org |
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-10-20 20:36 ---
Please put native code into VMAccessController from start if possible.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-10-20 17:45 ---
Actually using the native API is probably the better option, since having a
public stack trace API in Java is likely a security problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-10-20 17:44 ---
The patch will need to be updated for the new stack trace infrastructure,
because the interface to stack traces has changed. In particular, the
gnu.gcj.runtime.StackTrace class is no longer supported.
Either a)
--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-20 16:16 ---
Is there any special reason why this patch is unreviewed? Might it make things
worse?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-13 21:21
---
See this unreviewed patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2004-q3/msg00372.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604
