https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punitb20 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
Ben Longbons changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
--- Comment #4 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> There are other reasons why using static libraries does not make sense for
> libpthread.
i can't immediately think of any, can you give a hint?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
There are other reasons why using static libraries does not make sense for
libpthread.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
--- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
i see the glibc threads linked from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5784
but there are other libcs with static linking support, so even
if weakrefs worked on glibc (now they don't) thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78017
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
IIRC this was declared a libc bug or an user error (not using the full
archive). There is another thread on the glibc side if you want to read up on
that.
10 matches
Mail list logo