http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-04-18 08:31:47
UTC ---
Another build problem at
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10202966/android-ndk-fortran-build-of-lapack-problems-with-unresolved-sincos
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Summary|Make libgfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-12-22 20:44:44
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Dec 22 20:44:32 2011
New Revision: 182638
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182638
Log:
PR 51646 Use POSIX mode flags in open() argument.
2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-12-21 10:21:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Good catch! I suppose it's possible that all targets we support have the POSIX
> flags, but since we're in stage 3 I think it's fine to play it safe and do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
