http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-05-06
20:06:42 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk. Holding for backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-29
15:09:03 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 29 15:08:57 2011
New Revision: 173168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173168
Log:
2011-04-29 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-29
14:56:08 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 29 14:56:02 2011
New Revision: 173166
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173166
Log:
2011-04-29 Jerry DeLisle
Janne Blom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-25 08:43:32 UTC ---
The patch submitted to the list is different to the one I based my comments on.
My mistake.
Good work.
With the current method of letting printf do the conversion, there seems to b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-24 23:54:11 UTC ---
On 04/24/2011 02:41 PM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
>
> --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich
> 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-24
23:43:34 UTC ---
Regarding comment #2. The patch completely eliminates this code. I did not
feel confident that it is safe enough for all platforms. My approach is to
first get the output correct, t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at frontier dot com 2011-04-24 23:24:53 UTC ---
On 04/24/2011 02:41 PM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
>
> --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich
> 2011-0
On 04/24/2011 02:41 PM, thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-24 21:41:16 UTC ---
I don't have access to a build system until Tuesday, so I couldn't test your
patch. But I'm not sure I understan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-24 21:41:16 UTC ---
I don't have access to a build system until Tuesday, so I couldn't test your
patch. But I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to do.
I see that you added one more digit in th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-24
20:33:17 UTC ---
Patch submitted to gfortran list for review.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
Thomas Henlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24081|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jvdelisle at gcc dot
|g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-23 13:19:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 24081
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24081
Revised test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-23 11:06:28 UTC ---
The second branch (let printf do rounding) should only be choosen if the
requested rounding mode is the same as printf uses (nearest/compatible?) and
either
- the format is ES or
- th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-23 07:49:33 UTC ---
I think I found the problematic code in write_float:
if (f->format == FMT_F || f->format == FMT_EN || f->format == FMT_G
|| ((f->format == FMT_D || f->format == FMT_E)
17 matches
Mail list logo
