http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-28
07:38:06 UTC ---
Yeah, relinking, not prelinking, sorry.
I guess something along the lines of make_relative_prefix might work, if a
twisted maze of soft links doesn't make it unworkable. IIRC that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-27 17:47:12 UTC ---
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> This could bring an improvement for a few platforms, but it wouldn't solve the
> problme in general. On platf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-25 16:55:18 UTC ---
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, rwild at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> But there is a good reason to relink on ELF: uninstalled libraries and
> executables get DT_RPATH entries agains
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #7 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-01-25
06:40:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> I would note incidentally a suggestion (comment #3) to work around the
> general libtool bug on MinGW by stopping it relinking on MinGW. I don't
> belie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-24 23:29:27 UTC ---
That would not be an appropriate use of WONTFIX; WONTFIX is for cases such
as bugs in a target that has been removed. It's a clear bug in libtool;
SUSPENDED might be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-13 18:39:47 UTC ---
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, rwild at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> So is this only about the MinGW case? Because there, we should just fix
> libtool to not ever relink.
No, it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-07 13:25:18 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Do we really need to support it? DESTDIR just works, and when install
> prefix=/whatever doesn't work already fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46607
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
12 matches
Mail list logo
