--- Comment #24 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 14:12 ---
Subject: Bug 41711
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Dec 8 14:12:06 2009
New Revision: 155088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=155088
Log:
2009-12-08 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/41711
--- Comment #23 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 15:56 ---
Dominique, does the following program work on a real(16) system such as Darwin?
! { dg-do run }
! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_large_real }
! { dg-require-effective-target fortran_large_int }
!
! PR fortran
--- Comment #22 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-07 14:55 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> ...
> real(10) :: r10
> ...
This does work on platforms that do not support real(10), but have real(16).
Something such as:
integer,parameter :: k8 = selected_real_kind (precision (0.
--- Comment #21 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 14:43 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Dominique's idea is good. Let's go to that (comment #14) for now and leave
> the rest as enhancement. This would be a great project for a new volunteer.
> > Anyone interested. I am will
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 14:00
---
I agree with everyone. ;) Let's not split hairs. Dominique's idea is good.
Let's go to that (comment #14) for now and leave the rest as enhancement. This
would be a great project for a new volunteer. Anyone int
--- Comment #19 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 09:33 ---
> (In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > I disagree with your conclusion that this is invalid. :-)
> > 10.6.1 explicitly says that the BOZ descriptors may be used
> > for real and complex.
> (In r
--- Comment #18 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 09:23 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I disagree with your conclusion that this is invalid. :-)
>
> 10.6.1 explicitly says that the BOZ descriptors may be used
> for real and complex.
(In reply to comment #17)
> Richard Main
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 01:35
---
I found the thread on this:
http://www.rhinocerus.net/forum/lang-fortran/585916-printing-64-bit-binary-number-gfortran-4-1-2-a.html
Richard Maine says:
" from the thread
> program test_acos
>
> implicit none
>
--- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-06 01:16 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > > According to a note I spotted on clf , reading and writing reals with BOZ
> > > is
> > > invalid, so what we are doing here is an extension.
> > Do you hav
--- Comment #15 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-05 15:01 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> > According to a note I spotted on clf , reading and writing reals with BOZ is
> > invalid, so what we are doing here is an extension.
> Do you have a pointer?
I have the following:
"10
10 matches
Mail list logo
