[Bug libfortran/40344] O32 libgfortran.so fails to link on IRIX 6.5

2010-01-06 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-01-06 12:24 --- Subject: Re: O32 libgfortran.so fails to link on IRIX 6.5 > --- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-18 14:48 --- > I cannot see any point in retaining this PR against the gfortran

[Bug libfortran/40344] O32 libgfortran.so fails to link on IRIX 6.5

2009-12-18 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-18 14:48 --- I cannot see any point in retaining this PR against the gfortran target. I am marking it, especially in light of Rainer's remarks, as WONTFIX. Cheers Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: Wha

[Bug libfortran/40344] O32 libgfortran.so fails to link on IRIX 6.5

2009-06-15 Thread ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
--- Comment #3 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2009-06-15 16:51 --- Subject: Re: O32 libgfortran.so fails to link on IRIX 6.5 rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org writes: > Would it help to work around this issue by collecting the objects in one or > more > convenience archives a

[Bug libfortran/40344] O32 libgfortran.so fails to link on IRIX 6.5

2009-06-15 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-15 16:11 --- Would it help to work around this issue by collecting the objects in one or more convenience archives and linking those (plus at least one plain object) together to form libgfortran.la? The intermediate partially link

[Bug libfortran/40344] O32 libgfortran.so fails to link on IRIX 6.5

2009-06-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 20:48 --- > ld: FATAL 2 : Internal: at ../../ld/multigot.c lgot_local_got_offset() > seg_ndx exceeds per_seg_lgot_table Sounds like a linker bug. What was actually the solution for http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc