[Bug libfortran/38668] advance="no": no buffering, truncate and seek

2009-05-26 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-27 01:22 --- Subject: Bug 38668 Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed May 27 01:21:22 2009 New Revision: 147887 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147887 Log: 2009-05-23 Jerry DeLisle Backport from mainl

[Bug libfortran/38668] advance="no": no buffering, truncate and seek

2009-04-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-15 19:46 --- Fixed in trunk as r146134 & r146135. -- jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/38668] advance="no": no buffering, truncate and seek

2009-01-18 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-18 09:38 --- My patch for PR25561 fixes this partially, with the patch the strace output is: write(3, "a", 1)= 1 write(3, "a", 1)= 1 write(3, "a", 1)= 1 write(3,

[Bug libfortran/38668] advance="no": no buffering, truncate and seek

2008-12-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 11:16 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Strange to say, this depends on the bittian-ness. > On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with -m32 and on i686-pc-linux-gnu, I get > the behavior described. > On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu without -m3

[Bug libfortran/38668] advance="no": no buffering, truncate and seek

2008-12-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 10:02 --- Strange to say, this depends on the bittian-ness. On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu with -m32 and on i686-pc-linux-gnu, I get the behavior described. On x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu without -m32, I get lseek(3, 9613, SEEK_S