--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-14 18:32 ---
Subject: Bug 36886
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Aug 14 18:31:32 2008
New Revision: 139111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139111
Log:
2008-08-14 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR li
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-03 09:22 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > Created an attachment (id=16001)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16001&action=view) [edit]
> > better patch
>
> I think some of the run-time checks (with -fbounds-che
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-03 07:23 ---
> Created an attachment (id=16001)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16001&action=view) [edit]
> better patch
I think some of the run-time checks (with -fbounds-checks) for PR 36874 can be
best done
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-02 23:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=16001)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16001&action=view)
better patch
This one is better :-)
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-02 23:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=16000)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16000&action=view)
proposed patch for cshift0
Here's something that works for cshift0.
cshift1 still to do...
--
http://gcc.
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-22 11:58 ---
Related to PR 32972 (optimizing cshift the way that other
array intrinsics have been done will cure this).
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
