[Bug libfortran/36120] selected_char_kind_1.f90 undefined reference with -m32

2008-05-11 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-11 14:58 --- Closing. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UN

[Bug libfortran/36120] selected_char_kind_1.f90 undefined reference with -m32

2008-05-06 Thread Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2008-05-06 12:14 --- Subject: Re: selected_char_kind_1.f90 undefined reference with -m32 * fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote on Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:08:59PM CEST: > > I can only see that happening with --enable-main

[Bug libfortran/36120] selected_char_kind_1.f90 undefined reference with -m32

2008-05-06 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 12:08 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Next time you see such an issue, can you please try to note as many details as > possible, open a PR and Cc: me? I will, sorry. I was really more in a hurry of getting my patch regtesti

[Bug libfortran/36120] selected_char_kind_1.f90 undefined reference with -m32

2008-05-06 Thread Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2008-05-06 12:00 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Is that a clean build? The symbol is new and I think sometimes dependencies > don't get updated fine. I saw that one at some point, but a clean build made > it > disappear. Next time

[Bug libfortran/36120] selected_char_kind_1.f90 undefined reference with -m32

2008-05-06 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 11:12 --- Is that a clean build? The symbol is new and I think sometimes dependencies don't get updated fine. I saw that one at some point, but a clean build made it disappear. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org change