[Bug libfortran/34671] any(kind=1) and all(kind=1)

2008-01-20 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 09:20 --- As this turned out to be wrong-code, adjusting severity and setting target milestone (after the fact :-) -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/34671] any(kind=1) and all(kind=1)

2008-01-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 21:24 --- Fixed on trunk. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/34671] any(kind=1) and all(kind=1)

2008-01-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-15 21:22 --- Subject: Bug 34671 Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Jan 15 21:22:07 2008 New Revision: 131553 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131553 Log: 2008-01-15 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR li

[Bug libfortran/34671] any(kind=1) and all(kind=1)

2008-01-05 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-05 13:04 --- Using GFOR_POINTER_TO_L1 for writing in "any" and "all" isn't a good idea (it would lead to undefined bytes in the target array). I'll leave those alone and just add the corresponding _l1 and _l2 functions. For "co

[Bug libfortran/34671] any(kind=1) and all(kind=1)

2008-01-04 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 12:49 --- Same thing for count. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34671

[Bug libfortran/34671] any(kind=1) and all(kind=1)

2008-01-04 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-04 11:19 --- oops, seems we're still missing the relevant library functions for kind=1 and kind=2, too: $ cat any.f90 program main logical(kind=1) :: f(2,2) f = .false. print *,any(f,dim=1) print *,all(f,dim=1) end prog