--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 16:36
---
Fixed on trunk, closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 16:35
---
Subject: Bug 32611
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 15 16:35:07 2007
New Revision: 126656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126656
Log:
2007-07-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 16:29
---
Subject: Bug 32611
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 15 16:29:19 2007
New Revision: 126655
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126655
Log:
2007-07-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 16:26
---
Subject: Bug 32611
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 15 16:26:22 2007
New Revision: 126654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126654
Log:
2007-07-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-07-09 05:57 ---
Subject: Bug number PR32611
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00746.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-08 07:01
---
F77 Standard:
13.5.9 (3) "On output, the representation of a positive or zero internal value
in the field may be prefixed with a plus, as controlled by the S, SP, and SS
edit descriptors (13.5.6) or the processor.
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 15:23
---
OK, you talked me into it. :)
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 07:49
---
IIRC, F95 requires not to print the minus sign but F2003 allows to do it (and
we should probably do it since we handle negative zeros well on most other
counts).
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 07:08 ---
Jerry, I think this is something for you.
y = -0.0 is printed as
0.E+00
instead of
-0.E+00
I think the problem is in io/write.c's output_float.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
