--- Comment #20 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-25 22:39
---
*** Bug 31706 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-03 01:04
---
Yes, this is fixed, closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-02 22:49 ---
Is this PR fixed or not? Looking at the initial and the additional example, it
seems to be fixed both in 4.2 and in 4.3. Can this PR be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31099
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 01:57
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 16 01:57:16 2007
New Revision: 122975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122975
Log:
2007-03-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 01:54
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 16 01:54:25 2007
New Revision: 122974
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122974
Log:
2007-03-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 01:11
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 16 01:11:01 2007
New Revision: 122973
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122973
Log:
2007-03-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 00:41
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 16 00:41:36 2007
New Revision: 122970
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122970
Log:
2007-03-15 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-16 00:04
---
Reopening - missed part of this. Patch submitted for approval
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jellby at yahoo dot com 2007-03-14 09:04 ---
I get the same error if I rewind the file (or is it illegal?):
PROGRAM TEST
INTEGER :: A
OPEN(10, FORM="UNFORMATTED", RECL=1024)
A = -1
WRITE(10) A
REWIND(10)
WRITE(10) A
END PROGRAM TEST
--
jellby a
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 00:05
---
Fixed on 4.2 and 4.3
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 00:03
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 10 00:03:19 2007
New Revision: 122776
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122776
Log:
2007-03-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 00:00
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 10 00:00:21 2007
New Revision: 122775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122775
Log:
2007-03-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 23:55
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 9 23:55:17 2007
New Revision: 122773
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122773
Log:
2007-03-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 21:51
---
Subject: Bug 31099
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 9 21:51:39 2007
New Revision: 122763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122763
Log:
2007-03-09 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-03-09 21:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR31099
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00576.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #5 from Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2007-03-09 20:13
---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.2 regression] Runtime error on legal code using RECL
> I believe I have a fix. I am testing now. We were not initializing a few
> things when we have a record length given.
>
> Index: io
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 18:02
---
I believe I have a fix. I am testing now. We were not initializing a few
things when we have a record length given.
Index: io/open.c
===
--- io/op
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 12:55 ---
I was checking where bytes_left is set:
open.c: u->bytes_left = 0;
This is the default setting in new_unit (/* Open an unused unit. */)
It is also set to 0 in file_pos.c (two places).
In list_read.c's next_char i
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 12:29 ---
The error setting happens in io/transfer.c's write_buf:
/* Unformatted sequential. */
have_written = 0;
if (dtp->u.p.current_unit->flags.has_recl
&& (gfc_offset) nbytes > dtp->u.p.cur
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 10:06
---
This one hurts. Nevertheless, it's probably too late for 4.2.0...
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
