[Bug libfortran/28354] 0.99999 printed as 0. instead of 1. by format(f3.0)

2006-08-27 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 05:17 --- Subject: Bug 28354 Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Aug 28 05:17:09 2006 New Revision: 116503 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116503 Log: 2006-08-27 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug libfortran/28354] 0.99999 printed as 0. instead of 1. by format(f3.0)

2006-08-27 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-28 05:14 --- Subject: Bug 28354 Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Aug 28 05:14:05 2006 New Revision: 116502 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116502 Log: 2006-08-27 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug libfortran/28354] 0.99999 printed as 0. instead of 1. by format(f3.0)

2006-08-21 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 00:25 --- I will take this on, -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added A

[Bug libfortran/28354] 0.99999 printed as 0. instead of 1. by format(f3.0)

2006-08-21 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-21 11:26 --- OK, right, I don't have time to fix this. I've looked at the rounding code, and carry propagation, and I think we'd need a new special case to handle that, but couldn't find a way to do it that doesn't break other

[Bug libfortran/28354] 0.99999 printed as 0. instead of 1. by format(f3.0)

2006-07-12 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 15:21 --- Confirmed, and not target-specific. I'll look into it. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -