--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 02:17
---
Fixed on 4.1.1
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #19 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 02:16
---
Subject: Bug 26423
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 3 02:16:06 2006
New Revision: 111665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111665
Log:
2006-03-02 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 02:11
---
Subject: Bug 26423
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Mar 3 02:11:07 2006
New Revision: 111664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111664
Log:
2006-03-02 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-25 01:24
---
I have reverted back several patches and the problem in Comment #15 is not a
recent regression. I have opened a new PR for this since it manifests
completely differently. See PR26464.
This PR26423 is fixed in
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 21:40
---
I will have to revert back a bit and see if this too is a regression or
something new. (yer killin me man! ;) )
Seriuously, though. We'll take all the testing we can get, even if it is
frustrating. Thanks.
-
--- Comment #15 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-02-24 20:55 ---
Hi Jerry,
I tried the new version of gfortran with your patches. My real programs now
run and all the old test programs worked, but of course I had to try something
new. Buffer sizes of 5000 and 1 worked Ok, but I g
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 18:23
---
Subject: Bug 26423
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 24 18:23:38 2006
New Revision: 111421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111421
Log:
2006-02-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 18:16
---
Subject: Bug 26423
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 24 18:16:25 2006
New Revision: 111420
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111420
Log:
2006-02-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 15:08
---
Patch submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-02/msg00498.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 03:23
---
I have confirmed that the regression occurred after Thomas patch to pr23815. I
think Janne is on the right track related to pr25949.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26423
--- Comment #10 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 19:47 ---
I'm working on a patch for this, I think I found the problem.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-02-23 17:24 ---
It also works at version 110894, just before the patch for pr25835 -
[dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% gfortran -o testio8 testio8.f
[dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% testio8
1.00 -1.00
--- Comment #8 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-02-23 15:54 ---
I restore the last version (110201) that I tested just after -
2006-01-24 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libgfortran/25835
* io/transfer.c (st_read_done): Flush buffers when read is done.
and it works
--- Comment #7 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 14:52 ---
It might be related to my patch for PR25949.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
14 matches
Mail list logo
