--- Comment #17 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 07:40 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Can this PR now be closed?
Yes, I think so. There are still some remnants of ASF in internal I/O, but I
don't think it hurts.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|R
--- Comment #16 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-04 06:43 ---
Can this PR now be closed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-27 01:22
---
Subject: Bug 25561
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed May 27 01:21:22 2009
New Revision: 147887
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147887
Log:
2009-05-23 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from main
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-05 20:14
---
Subject: Bug 25561
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 5 20:13:56 2009
New Revision: 145571
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145571
Log:
2009-04-05 Daniel Kraft
PR fortran/38654
--- Comment #13 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-22 10:51 ---
Subject: Bug 25561
Author: jb
Date: Sun Mar 22 10:51:05 2009
New Revision: 144993
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144993
Log:
2009-03-22 Janne Blomqvist
PR libfortran/25561 libfortran/
--- Comment #12 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-18 09:30 ---
Small patch on top of the big patch in comment #11 in order to fix a couple
minor issues:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00152.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561
--- Comment #11 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-05 22:15 ---
Patch getting rid of ASF for external files:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00222.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561
--- Comment #10 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 17:43 ---
Subject: Bug 25561
Author: jb
Date: Fri May 16 17:42:44 2008
New Revision: 135433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135433
Log:
Part 1.1 of PR25561.
2008-05-15 Janne Blomqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 08:12 ---
Patch with some improvements for part 1 here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg00924.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561
--- Comment #8 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-15 18:32 ---
Subject: Bug 25561
Author: jb
Date: Thu May 15 18:30:29 2008
New Revision: 135388
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135388
Log:
Remove XFAIL from gfortran.dg/fmt_t_7.f
2008-05-15 Janne Blomqvist <
--- Comment #7 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-15 15:54 ---
Subject: Bug 25561
Author: jb
Date: Thu May 15 15:53:34 2008
New Revision: 135373
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135373
Log:
Part 1 of PR 25561.
2008-05-15 Janne Blomqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 19:07 ---
Patch for part 1 here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg00769.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561
--- Comment #5 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-02 15:37 ---
Working on a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561
--- Comment #4 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-16 14:12 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Why marking this as blocking asynchronous I/O?
Well, no hard dependency. I just thought it would make sense to do this first,
as it would reduce the work required to convert the library to a mo
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-14 11:33
---
Why marking this as blocking asynchronous I/O?
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 23:25 ---
Good idea.
Confirmed.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-17 22:10 ---
Switched dependencies to the correct order.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
17 matches
Mail list logo
