[Bug libfortran/22217] Z edit descriptor with negative numbers

2005-07-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-19 08:18 --- No need to apply on 4.0 branch, since support for large kinds is only in mainline. Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libfortran/22217] Z edit descriptor with negative numbers

2005-07-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-09 09:33 --- Subject: Bug 22217 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-09 09:33:32 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io : w

[Bug libfortran/22217] Z edit descriptor with negative numbers

2005-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-05 07:52 --- For the GFC_LARGEST_INTEGER_KIND macro, there is already a GFC_INTEGER_LARGEST. Or do you mean that GFC_LARGEST_INTEGER_KIND should be just 8 (or 16), not GFC_INTEGER_8 (or GFC_INTEGER_16)? As for this bu

[Bug libfortran/22217] Z edit descriptor with negative numbers

2005-06-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-30 08:29 --- It's probably easiest to have xtoa() and friends extract the integer for themselves. If you do this, don't forget to increase the size of buffer[] so it can hold largest_integer_kind*8+1 characters for bina

[Bug libfortran/22217] Z edit descriptor with negative numbers

2005-06-29 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-29 20:53 --- Confirmed. This bug is due to my recent patch to support large integer kinds. I'm thinking about how we should fix this. -- What|Removed |Added